Luckily Franklin's contributions to science haven't been erased from history.
Watson's writing is friendly and easy enough to read. The pages are clean. Is it just me, or are there not many well-written scientific memoirs around? I have more respect to great men and women who did science because they really loved digging up more and more facts about something they truly love, something that they can't stop thinking about. I cannot believe that I've never read this book before. New York. About the educational games.
She may have suffered from an unfair lack of recognition in her lifetime, but her legacy lives on in both molecular biology and microscopy. The Royal Society offers an annual Rosalind Franklin Award , and there's even a university named after her.
Still, it seems a crime that she's not rightly credited as the person who discovered DNA's structure. Perhaps it's time for a new naming scheme. How about Franklin and Crick?
Or Franklin and Wilkins her student, who was also a Nobel winner? That seems like a proper way to memorialize the scientist who actually discovered the molecule's structure in the first place.
The A. Annalee Newitz. Each DNA strand within the double helix is a long, linear molecule made of smaller units called nucleotides that form a chain.
The chemical backbones of the double helix are made up of sugar and phosphate molecules that are connected by chemical bonds, known as sugar-phosphate backbones. The two helical strands are connected through interactions between pairs of nucleotides, also called base pairs.
Two types of base pairing occur: nucleotide A pairs with T, and nucleotide C pairs with G.
Further Exploration Concept Links for further exploration helicase phosphate backbone nucleic acid DNA phosphate backbone replication. In , the Modern Library placed The Double Helix at number 7 on its list of the best nonfiction books of the 20th century.
Though an important book about an immensely important subject, it was and remains a controversial account. The intimate first-person memoir about scientific discovery was unusual for its time. The book has been hailed for its highly personal view of scientific work, though has been criticised as caring only about the glory of priority and the author is claimed to be willing to appropriate data from others surreptitiously in order to obtain it.
The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA is an autobiographical account of the discovery of the double helix structure of. Start by marking “The Double Helix” as Want to Read: By identifying the structure of DNA, the molecule of life, Francis Crick and James Watson revolutionized biochemistry & won themselves a Nobel Prize. Watson, who co-discovered the double helix structure of DNA (deoxyribonucleic.
It has also been criticized as being disagreeably sexist towards Rosalind Franklin , another participant in the discovery, who was deceased by the time Watson's book was written. Burton Feldman . It presents a selection of both positive and negative reviews of the book, by such figures as Philip Morrison , Richard Lewontin , Alex Comfort , Jacob Bronowski , and more in-depth analyses by Peter Medawar , Robert K.
Merton , and Andre Lwoff. Erwin Chargaff declined permission to reprint his unsympathetic review from the March 29, , issue of Science , but letters in response from Max Perutz , Maurice Wilkins, and Watson are printed. Also included are retrospectives from a edition of Nature written by Francis Crick and Linus Pauling , and an analysis of Franklin's work by her student Aaron Klug.
She claims that Watson's book did not give a balanced description of Rosalind Franklin and the nature of her interactions with Maurice Wilkins at King's College, London.